lunes, 6 de marzo de 2017

Buenos Aires - El nuevo Acuerdo de Facilitación del Comercio de la OMC

 Hoy, 16 de marzo, en Buenos Aires, la Cámara de Exportadores de la República Argentina, junto con el International Trade Centre (OMC-UNCTAD), dieron comienzo al primer día del Seminario Internacional Sector Privado y el Acuerdo de Facilitación del Comercio - OMC, Agenda de Implementación. 

La excelente presentación por Ezequiel Gulcovsky Leguizamón motivó un continuo debate e intercambio de opiniones sobre los aspectos prácticos que hacen a la manera de implementar el Acuerdo, en este caso en la República Argentina.

Realmente debemos felicitar a CERA y al ITC por esta iniciativa que reunió a expertos y operadores muy conocedores del tema. Mañana continúa y concluye este muy oportuno -e indispensable- seminario.

Mauricio López Dardaine

No está de más comenzar a señalar algunos de los aspectos de interés que forman parte del  nuevo Acuerdo de Facilitación del Comercio de la OMC. Al respecto nos basamos en la versión española de la Guía de Negocios a la que hacemos mención en nuestro reciente comentario (4/3/17) "Centro de Comercio Internacional - Acuerdo sobre Facilitación del Comercio de la OMC - Una guía de negocios para los Países en Desarrollo".


Mauricio López Dardaine 



Resultado de imagen para shipping images

"Los Artículos 1 a 5 [del Acuerdo] tratan de la TRANSPARENCIA y amplían el Artículo X del GATT.

1. Publicación
2. Información disponible por internet
3. Servicios de información
4. Notificación

INFORMACION

Procedimientos
formularios
documentos
tipos impositivos
normas para la CLASIFICACIÓN y VALORACIÓN de mercaderías en la aduana
NORMAS DE ORIGEN
restricciones al tránsito y procedimientos
PROCEDIMIENTOS DE APELACIÓN
Acuerdos Comerciales
Acuerdos de gestión de contingentes arancelarios"

(Las mayúsculas en el listado anterior son nuestras)

La OECD, siempre según la fuente citada, considera que las RESOLUCIONES ANTICIPADAS son una de las medidas más efectivas entre las contenidas en este nuevo Acuerdo.

Para todos aquellos con experiencia en comercio exterior, la incongruencia de las decisiones que puede sufrir un operador, en especial cuando las normas aduaneras no son transparentes, implican demoras, costos, litigios, pérdidas comerciales, más esa desagradable sensación de ser manipulados por funcionarios con latitud para aplicar "normas" que el operador desconoce. La transparencia pues, incluyendo las RESOLUCIONES ANTICIPADAS, no es una cuestión menor. Implica ahorro de tiempo, ahorro de costos, un riesgo mucho menor de ser sometido a manejos corruptos, una mayor seguridad de que el cliente va a recibir el producto en tiempo y forma, que un bien perecedero no va a descomponerse en un depósito sin cadena de frío, etc, etc, etc.

Estos cinco primeros artículos se refieren pues a cuestiones que, de ser corregidas y mejoradas han de redundar en operaciones mucho más predecibles.

De ahí que consideramos que es uno de los motivos -desde ya no el único- para seguir de cerca la aplicación de este acuerdo puesto en vigencia el pasado 22 de febrero.

Comentario de MLD: puedo decirles, luego de haber dedicado parte de tres días a la lectura del texto original del Acuerdo, que la TRANSPARENCIA en sus diversas facetas parece ser efectivamente el leit Motiv para lograr este objetivo de la Facilitación del Comercio que se proponen los Países Miembros de la OMC, que con tanto empeño han logrado concretar este compromiso. Ello, obviamente, implica que países como los nuestros, con el fin de implementar el Acuerdo, se verán enfrentados a sectores donde la transparencia no ha sido sin duda la forma habitual de manejar sobretodo los complejos procesos de importación . Es auspicioso en tal sentido que en la Argentina las autoridades estén empeñadas, desde diciembre de 2015, en una dura tarea de transparentar las acciones que llevan a cabo las distintas dependencias del Estado.

*************************************************

Here we would like to stress the importance of  ADVANCE RULING within the provisions of the Agreement. Under Article 3, point 9, (a), it states:

"9. Definitions and scope: 

(a) An advance ruling is a written decision provided by a Member to the applicant prior to the importation of a good covered by the application that sets forth the treatment that the Member shall provide to the good at the time of importation with regard to: (i) the good's tariff classification; and (ii) the origin of the good."

The respective foot-note is also i mportant:

"It is understood that an advance ruling on the origin of a good may be an assessment of origin for the purposes of the Agreement on Rules of Origin where the ruling meets the requirements of this Agreement and the Agreement on Rules of Origin. Likewise, an assessment of origin under the Agreement on Rules of Origin may be an advance ruling on the origin of a good for the purposes of this Agreement where the ruling meets the requirements of both agreements. Members are not required to establish separate arrangements under this provision in addition to those established pursuant to the Agreement on Rules of Origin in relation to the assessment of origin provided that the requirements of this Article are fulfilled."

The Trade Facilitation Agreement: An overview

Source: the WTO site


The Trade Facilitation Agreement: An overview

Resultado de imagen para shipping images

The Trade Facilitation Agreement has three sections:
  • Section I contains provisions for expediting the movement, release and clearance of goods, including goods in transit. It clarifies and improves the relevant articles (VVIII and X) of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994. It also sets out provisions for customs cooperation.
  • Section II contains special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions that allow developing and least-developed countries (LDCs) to determine when they will implement individual provisions of the Agreement and to identify provisions that they will only be able to implement upon the receipt of technical assistance and support for capacity building
  • To benefit from SDT, a member must categorize each provision of the Agreement and notify other WTO members of these categorizations in accordance with specific timelines outlined in the Agreement.
  • Category A: 
  • provisions that the member will implement by the time the Agreement enters into force (or in the case of a least-developed country within one year after entry into force)  
  • Category B: 
  • provisions that the member will implement after a transitional period following the  entry into force of the Agreement 
  • Category C: 
  • provisions that the member will implement on a date after a transitional period following the entry into force of the Agreement and requiring the acquisition of assistance and support for capacity building.
For provisions designated as categories B and C, the member must provide dates for implementation of the provisions, as outlined in the following factsheets:
  • Section III 
  • contains provisions that establish a permanent committee on trade facilitation at the WTO, require members to have a national committee to facilitate domestic coordination and implementation of the provisions of the Agreement. It also sets out a few final provisions.

sábado, 4 de marzo de 2017

WTO's TFA has entered into force - Acuerdo sobre Facilitación del Comercio de la OMC entra en vigor

The WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement has now entered into force. It is the first WTO agreement allowing Developing Country Members to determine which commitments they will be able to implement right away, and which commitments will need a period of transition. The report by BRIDGES here bellow is  worth reading carefully.


Mauricio López Dardaine

Resultado de imagen para shipping images


"Muchos de los países menos adelantados (PMA) sufren problemas de mala conectividad por encontrarse en un área remota, no tener acceso al mar o ser pequeños estados insulares, en los que la infraestructura de transportes es a menudo deficitaria. Como resultado de ello, el costo medio del comercio es mayor en los PMA que en los países en desarrollo. 

"Por ejemplo, mover un contenedor a través de una frontera es el 43 % más caro. Estos costos afectan de manera desproporcionada a las pequeñas y medianas empresas (PYME), que en ocasiones no disponen de los medios y la capacidad para acatar normas complejas. 

"Los altos costos del cumplimiento de los procedimientos aduaneros y de fronteras y de otras medidas no arancelarias (MNA) representan cargas significativamente altas en comparación con su pequeño volumen comercial. Esto hace que las PYME no sean proveedoras competitivas y dificulta su integración en las cadenas de valor regionales y mundiales. Se cree que el Acuerdo sobre Facilitación del Comercio, (que será vinculante para todas las agencias en las fronteras, no solo para las autoridades aduaneras, de los 159 Estados miembros de la OMC), será benéfico para todos los operadores. Varios países en desarrollo, en especial los PMA, están preocupados por su aplicación, por lo que el Acuerdo ofrece cierta flexibilidad y se ha incluido asistencia técnica para poder implementarlo..." Fuente: Centro de Comercio Internacional "Acuerdo sobre Facilitación del Comercio de la OMC - Una guía de negocios para los Países en Desarrollo"


WTO's Trade Facilitation Agreement 
Takes Effect
23 February 2017

The World Trade Organization announced on Wednesday 22 February that the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) has now entered into force, having surpassed the minimum requirement of 110 ratifications from members.
“The Trade Facilitation Agreement is the biggest reform of global trade this century,” said WTO Director-General Roberto Azevêdo on Wednesday in confirming the news.
“It sends a message about the power of trade to support jobs and growth around the world – in developed and developing countries alike,” he continued.
The landmark agreement aims to cut customs-related red tape, easing the flow of trade between countries by simplifying customs procedures, speeding up the clearance of goods, supporting cooperation among customs officials, and otherwise making it quicker and more efficient for goods to cross borders.
The four ratifications announced on Wednesday included Chad, Jordan, Oman, and Rwanda, according to the Geneva-based trade body. Together with the previous 108 ratifications received, there are now 112 WTO members which have approved the deal in their domestic legislatures and submitted their “instruments of acceptance” to the organisation.
Under WTO rules, any new or revised trade agreements require approval by two-thirds of the organisation’s membership, which now numbers 164 members.

An innovative deal
The TFA’s entry into force has already drawn a public welcome by numerous WTO members in the hours since the news first broke, with officials citing the deal’s potential to slash trade costs, facilitate the involvement of smaller companies on the international trading scene, and support the increased participation of poorer countries in global value chains.
While estimates vary, some agencies such as the Organisation for Co-operation and Development (OECD) have placed the potential reduction in trade costs at approximately 11-15 percent for low-income and upper middle income countries, though this level would depend on the country involved and the agreement’s actual implementation in practice.
WTO data further suggests that African and least developed economies are the ones which stand to see the greatest savings as a result of the deal.
Notably, the TFA is the first WTO agreement that is structured in a way that allows developing country members to determine which commitments they are able to implement straight away, versus those which will require a transition period and potentially technical assistance and/or capacity-building.
“TFA is an innovative, modern agreement. We now need to implement it [and] deliver on its benefits,” said Harald Neple, the Norwegian Ambassador to the WTO who currently chairs the organisation’s General Council, according to a post on social media site Twitter.
Better border procedures and faster, smoother trade flows will revitalise global trade to the benefit of citizens in all parts of the world. Small companies, that have a hard time navigating daily bureaucracy and complicated rules, will be major winners,” said EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström.
Other officials in the trade and development community have also suggested that this reduction in trade costs could yield benefits on other fronts as well, specifically by freeing up or creating resources to fulfil other essential needs.
“New technologies and institutional reforms can improve governance, reduce entry barriers, and pull the informal sector into the formal sector. And with less paperwork to dodge, and fewer palms to grease, public revenues go up. This generates new resources for spending on essential services,” said Joakim Reiter, the Deputy Secretary General of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), in a press release.
Azevêdo similarly noted that the potential gains from the TFA could be manifold, especially for developing and least developed countries (LDCs).
“Developing countries could increase the number of products they export by 20 percent, while LDCs could see an increase of up to 35 percent,” said the WTO chief, suggesting that these countries could also have an easier time accessing other overseas markets and thus insulate themselves from “external economic shocks.”
Many in the business sector have also responded favourably to the news, with the International Chamber of Commerce ‘s (ICC) Chairman Sunil Bharti Mittal terming it a “watershed moment for global trade.”
“The entry into force of the agreement could not come at a more important moment given the imperative to make global growth more inclusive," Mittal added, noting that the TFA’s work to address onerous customs systems could be a boon to smaller companies, including in developing economies.
Over 12 years in the making
Negotiations for the TFA were concluded in December 2013 at the WTO’s Ninth Ministerial Conference in Bali, Indonesia, following round-the-clock negotiations among trade ministers to finalise the first new multilateral deal since the WTO opened its doors in the mid-1990s. The trade deal has been open for ratification since November 2014. (See Bridges Daily Update, 7 December 2013 and 27 November 2014)
The process to negotiate such a trade facilitation deal kicked off in 2004, following previous working-group level discussions on which of the so-called “Singapore issues” should be added to the WTO’s Doha Round of trade talks. (See Bridges Weekly, 28 November 2013)
While the future of the Doha agenda topics remains in flux, the TFA was able to move forward as part of an “early harvest” of issues that seemed the readiest for an agreed outcome.
Though the ratification process has now taken a few years, that time has allowed for other preparatory efforts to get underway, including the announcement of funding commitments from various countries and other financial streams to help provide the technical support and capacity building that some developing countries will need to implement certain provisions.
Within the WTO, a preparatory committee has also been at work over that timeframe to undertake steps such as collecting the relevant notifications from members of which TFA provisions they will implement immediately – the “Category A” commitments – and which ones may require additional time or support.
There have also been various training courses in place to help prepare WTO members in implementing the TFA in practice, including advanced courses hosted at the global trade body for the chairs of national trade facilitation committees.

A Trade Facilitation Agreement Facility (TFAF) has also been in place since late 2014 to help WTO members determine their support needs and who they could partner with to address them, among other functions.